COUNTERMEASURES
AGAINST CORONAVIRUS-2019
Up-dated 31 July 2020 of dated 30 June 2020
Sohei Matsuno (writer),
Prof. (free-lance), Dr. of Eng. (causation study)
Advisor on Technical
Affairs, Jamilla Restaurant, Palembang Indonesia
Kimora Matsuno (proofreader),
Student, Singapore International School
Alena Handi (illustrator),
Student, Maitreyawira School
CONTENTS
ABSTRACT
……………………………………………….. 3
INTRODUCTION ………………………………………… 3
Backdrop
of COVID-19 in Chaos ………………………… 3
Particular
Aspect of COVID-19 Pandemic ………………
4
Purpose of this Paper
…………………………………….. 7
EXIT STRATEGY FROM COVID-19 ………………….. 8
ANALYSES
OF COVID-19 ……………………................ 8
General
…………………………………………………….. 9
Causation Analysis of
COVID-19 ……………………….. 9
Relation between
COVID-19 and Wars ……………….. 11
Immortal Effects of Maoism
……………………………… 11
General
Effects of Mao’s Strategies and Tactics ………… 12
Analogy between
COVID-19 and Wars ……………….. 13
General
………………………………………………....... 13
Afghanistan War (2001 2020) ……………………………. 13
Yemen War (2015~present)
……………………….. ………. 15
Analogy to COVID-19
…………………………………... 16
PREPARATION FOR FUTURE SIMILAR VIRUS ...... 17
General …………………………………………………. 17
How to recruit Natural Predator
Candidate ………… 17
How to breed Candidate Natural
Predator ………….. 18
Dishwasher and pathogen Killer devices ……………..
19
CONCRUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATI/ONS ....... 20
EPILOGUE …………………………………………… 21
REFERENCES
……………………………………….. 21
Illus. 1 How about friendly chemicals?
… N, n, no, No thanks!
ABSTRACT
In Dec.
2019, the coronavirus
disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged in China. It’s now spreading worldwide. The
writer (he) discusses how countermeasures should’ve
been.
The discussions are
premised on recognitions of (i) COVID-19 transmission was
nasal-oral, (ii) colonavirus-19
(the Virus) is characterized
by its extraordinary strong ability in infection, wait-&-endure formation & adaptation
to chemicals, and (iii) the Virus emerged
when bio-lifecycle balance was disrupted by Homo
sapiens, having adapted itself to the environmental change with Darwin’s theory
of evolution.
Based on the premises,
he induces a hypothesis that says, “Anti-pathogen chemicals couldn’t kill but
strengthened the Virus.” He concludes
that a right countermeasure was to handover the Virus to its natural
predator, and if the things would’ve been done in this way, the COVID-19 case
should’ve ended within 2 (months).
As the Virus’
unprecedented characters were unknown at the beginning, it was unavoidable for
the 1st measures to have been done abided by existing programs.
Among the inappropriate practices carried out in this period, the worst one was
the disinfectant spray. It not only strengthened the Virus but killed its natural predators. In
this context, COVID-19’s rapid spread was unavoidable too. The matter is, “the inappropriate practices had been
repeated again-&-again until bankruptcy.” The current status is virtual
stalemate with the Virus. A sole exit
from this quagmire is to coexist with the Virus
& its natural predator in a new-bio-lifecycle.
The Virus
has demonstrated its potential ability to be a bio-weaponry material. It’s
also learnt that the bio-weapon is a double-edged sword unless a disposal
system of used virus has been established beforehand. To meet the need, he
shows the basic way to prepare natural predators for bio-weapon warfare.
Keywords: Adaptability of & natural predator of organism,
problems of chemicals
INTRODUCTION
Backdrop of COVID-19 in Chaos
Regardless of fields, every modern society heavily relies on a
system of computer programs. This system is potent in handling things being
incorporated in the programs. However, it’s miserably impotent to manage
something that happens beyond the programs. Really, the modern medical system, which currently prevails all over
the world, hadn’t incorporated COVID-19’s extraordinary characters in
its programs. In this context, the COVID-19 in chaos is a medical-field version
of the ones seen in other fields.
Originally,
a modern medical system is not good at COVID-19. As it stands on rationalism,
basically it relies on a deductive method by nature. COVID-19 problem is too
complicated to be solved deductively. Excuses
of medical experts at
medical institutions for their slow, passive and/or no reactions to
the matters happened beyond the programs are; “It’s not yet proven.
Nobody should do any unproven method.” But the
reality doesn’t wait the proof. cf. Quotation
(Quot.)-1.
Worse still, there’s a
strong promoter of COVID-19 pandemic. It’s a vested interest of ‘pharmaceutical-industrial complex.’ the Virus is a novel species which has ultra-high
adaptability to the chemicals. Hence, unlike other ordinary viruses, it survives
the chemicals. It resides anywhere with a wait-&-endure formation for about
2 weeks, and reactivates itself as a tempered 2nd generation.
Therefore, the war on the Virus with chemicals is unwinnable. Alas, this
quagmire guarantees the pharmaceutical industry a lucrative market. The
industry has deep-rooted lobbies in all health organizations, policy-makers,
experts, scholars worldwide, particularly in developed countries. Against the
backdrop stated above, people are forced to live in unwinnable war fields of
COVID-19. This is an abnormal period that will finish when a last resort ‘vaccine’ will be tried and failed.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Quot.-1: Wuhan mayor Zhou Xianwang claimed that he was unable to reveal information in the initial stages of the epidemic
because he was not authorized to do so.
Quot.-2: Beijing’s purge of officials in Hubei
province picked up pace with the removal of the top Communist Party of China
(CCP) leaders in the region. Hubei party secretary Jiang Chaoliang had been
replaced by Shanghai mayor Ying Yong, the Communist Party leader of the city of
Wuhan, Ma Guoqiang, 56, also lost his job.
Quot.-3: The decisions to
remove senior Communist Party officials echo [contrast to -- his translation] what happened in China 17 years ago during the
severe acute respiratory syndrome (Sars) outbreak. The health minister and the mayor of
Beijing were both fired in
April 2003 amid allegations of a cover-up
in reporting the extent of the disease.
Quot.-4: Zhang Jin, the Communist Party secretary of Hubei’s health
commission, and Liu Yingzi, director
of the health commission were both sacked on Tuesday. That’s an eerie echo
of the Sars outbreak, when the dismissal of the officials in 2003 followed a
10-fold jump in the reported number of infections – at that time in the
capital, Beijing.
Quot.-5: Officials in
organizations such as the National
Health Commission, Chinese Center
for Disease Control and Prevention, and Hubei Red Cross Association have been removed and warned for issues such as misjudgment
of the epidemic and lapses in
efforts against it.
Quot.-6: Some familiar with the changes say. “We can’t waste time anymore. Those who are responsible must go.” Meanwhile,
there’re some others who say, “Someone has to take responsibility. But most of those
people might not have made any mistakes but were simply caught in the storm.”
Note:
6 quotations shown above are extracts from [22].
Particular Aspect of COVID-19 Pandemic
COVID-19
firstly appeared in a food market of Wuhan city, Hubei province, China, in Nov.
~ Dec. 2019. The pathogen of the disease is a novel coronavirus-19. It entered a human body
through an intermediate host, a bat.
cf.
[20]. It caused the 1st
generation COVID-19. It showed flu-like symptoms and its incubation period
was reported to be 1 ~ 14 days. To this novel virus, programs based on a
hypothesis derived from past studies were applied. The past studies’ general concept on the
disinfectant is: (i) Coronavirus’s protective fat layer is weaker than other
common viruses. (ii) Hence, common household disinfectants, including soap or a
diluted bleach solution, can deactivate coronavirus on indoor surfaces. (iii)
On outdoor surfaces, a disinfectant spray is effective to deactivate colonavirus.
(iv)
The Environmental Protection Agency has a list of disinfectants that are
effective in fighting coronavirus. The general view for medicines is
conceptually the same as the one for the disinfectants stated above.
The past study’s norms are applicable to the
conventional coronavirus but inapplicable to the novel coronavirus-19. Disinfectants and
pharmaceuticals may have deactivated the Virus
but never killed it, rather, in effect, strengthened it.
Anyhow, with the wrong hypothesis stated above, all
sanitation-medical
operations commenced at every working front. Patients were
treated having abided by modern medicine programs, probably with flu-relief medicines et al, and then recovered. In fact, they recovered
having been immune to the 1st-generation Virus. But the 2nd-generation
one released from the patient, after having resided around the patients for
about 14 days in a wait-&-endure formation is, in every way, stronger than
the 1st-generation’s.
It transmits human to human via various media, finally through nose and/or
mouth. cf. [20]. It also ‘reenters’ its original human body ‘ex-patient’ as well. Then, people
confuse ‘reentry’ with ‘recurrence’, and wrongly conceive, ‘no immune in COVID-19’ and ‘heavier symptoms in reoccurrence than in
occurrence.’
COVID-19 has magnificently bankrupted the modern medicine(s) and
disinfectants in developed countries, in China also at the initial stage. It’s
proven by the real consequences of the practices.
Given an exponentially rapid spread of
COVID-19, China executed a fundamental regime change in charge. Reuters report
it “Feb 14, 2020, the major leadership
changes in Hubei
and Wuhan have been announced in an effort to control the epidemic.” cf.” Quot.-2.
Similar personnel removals were seen when the
severe acute respiratory syndrome (Sars) happened
in 2003. But the scope and reasons of removals in the case of Sars were quite
limited. cf. Quot.-3. In the case of COVID-19, personnel changes covered from
Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee to government / nongovernment
organizations in charge of health affairs. cf. [22] and Quot.-4 & 5.
There’re severe criticisms on one hand and warm sympathies for
the removed personnel on the other hand. cf. Quot.-6.
After Mao Zedong’s death (1976), China entered a modernization-industrialization-development
era with no regard to the appearance. Under this tide, assignments of 'the wrong person in the wrong place'
were apt to happen. At the time of COVID-19 outbreak, modernization-industrialization-development
technocrats were in positions to handle the matter. They couldn’t do it, as
they used to make their decisions based solely on the information from computer
programs, not the reality emerging before them. Technocrats’
ineptitude and inaction have proven their incapability of devising any measures to cope
with COVID-19 properly.
Contrarily, Maoism
& Chinese
medicine
stand on empiricism, hence, relies little on a deductive method by nature.
The reality is a primary base in every consideration. In this context, COVID-19
was originally not a subject of rationalists but of empiricists. Induction and deduction are both important tools in any study. Studies whose
themes must & may take time, e.g., a study on
vaccine, a deductive method play a leading role. It’s to be reiterated the
importance of ‘the right person in the
right place.’
After
analyses, he’s deduced that the personal removals done in connection with
COVID-19 are a rolling back of Maoist power. It’d come back not only with its
strategy, i.e. siege the city in rural
areas, but also with tactics, Chinese
medicine(s). It practically resulted in insignificant use of chemicals, as
Chinese medicine hardly relies on chemicals but herbs. It means that there’s much
lesser production of new generation coronavirus-19.
Note: Mao Zedong
was a strong promoter of Chinese medicine(s).
It’s
unknown if the Virus’ natural
predator was used. He supposes it wasn’t, because if it’d have been done, it
means that there must have been a good deal of the Virus stock beforehand on the one hand. On the other hand, it’s
hardly possible to accumulate the Virus
before its outbreak.
In this
context, the coronavirus in Hubei Bio Research Institute before COVID-19
epidemic was not of the Virus but any
other coronavirus, e.g., Sars Cov-2. The Virus
stocked in the USA, as some www repots, is not the one before COVID-19 outbreak
but after it. That is; neither initiated the COVID-19, and is eligible for the
cause of WWIII.
Anyway,
countermeasures under the new regime have succeeded. China, once the no.1
ranked country in a world worst COVID-19 case list in Feb. 20 2020, is ranked
no.26 in the same list as of July 27 2020. The USA, a late-starter with the Virus imported from China, took over
ranking no.1 from China in Mar. 20 2020, and holding the ranking up until now.
The World
Health Organization (WHO) praised China for “setting a new standard for outbreak control,” even suggesting that
other countries should replicate its strict containment measures.
However in
reality, many countries, industrially-developed countries in particular, were
slow to issue shelter-in-place guidelines. They’re originally reluctant to lock
down as it retards economy. There’s strong reactionary pressure from various
industrial complexes. So in practices, the lockdown is so loose that not to do
is better than to do. Under this condition, it’s not strange that the top 10
worst COVID-19 case list is always congested by the industrially developed or
rapidly developing countries.
In this general trend, there’s an exception. It’s Iran who
already pertains to an industrially developed country. China who sees Iran as a
strategic friend helped Iran maybe with its full expertise, and Iran may have
followed it to some extent. Under this condition, it’s not strange that Iran
ranked no.2 after China in the list in Feb. 20 2020 has dropped down to no.11
as of July 27 2020.
The WHO says “Life
with the new coronavirus must be considered a new normal until vaccination or
effective treatment is developed for the disease caused by the pathogen.”
cf. [21].
In the first place, there’s no pharmaceutical (vaccine or chemical)
to counter any virus that has had adaptability to pharmaceuticals. All efforts
to get it are doomed to failure.
By the way, it usually takes at shortest 2 (yrs) up until acquiring an effective,
safe and practical vaccine even for a usual virus. In this context, any
COVID-19 vaccine that emerges on markets before 2 (yrs), as some media report, is a latecomer at best or a murderer at
worst.
On the other hand, a natural predator of the Virus must exist, since God never create
an invincible creature, but always provides its natural predator to keep balance.
What humans should do is to find it, breed it and let it eat the Virus. That’s all. Then, the new
bio-lifecycle balance will be
regained in cooperation with the natural predator within 2 (months), if measures of to do and not to
do are implemented as suggested. The
intended vaccination is to do the same in human bodies. But if the matter could be solved within the
nature without using human shields, it’s better of course.
To meet these realities, he shall revise WHO’s
above statement for good as follows:
“Current life
with the new coronavirus must be considered a transient abnormal until it
recovers new balance with pathogen.”
Note: Revisions are by addition
or replacement.
He assumes that the transient abnormal period
will finish within 6 (till new cases = 0) + 2 (till active cases = 0) = 8 (months), if all negative actions, e.g.,
lockdowns, vaccine-chemical trials won’t be.
The above estimations of durations have been
derived from the premises that in the S-hemisphere, there’re lesser aeration
tanks of sewage treatment plants where the Virus
is mass-produced, and no extra tropical cyclone by which the Virus is mass-transported. To be
concrete, the COVID-19 pandemic in the S-hemisphere advances without big discontinuity
but with linier infection only. It means that the Time vs. COVID-19 case relationship
in S-hemisphere follows direct-proportionally to the one in N-hemisphere.
Purpose of this
Paper
The
purposes of this paper are (i) to show the backdrop against
which the countermeasures have been in standstill, (ii) to identify the
unprecedented characters of the Virus,
(iii)
to clarify the particular aspect of COVID-19, (iv) to forward before
the parties concerned right countermeasures against coronavirus-2019, and (v)
to direct the way to deal with any virus of the same character as the Virus that’s to come in ar future.
EXIT STRATEGY FROM COVID-19
The WHO
sees the current status of COVID-19 is consistent, and a sole exit from it is
to have a last resort vaccination or
its equivalent. cf. the WHO’s statement quoted above. As explained already,
there’s no last-resort vaccine on
COVID-19. That is, the WHO has practically no exit strategy.
Nobody likes such a status. But everybody can endure
it when told as if there’s an ultimate means to exit. How long can people
endure such a convincement? Human history tells, “The longest record is 18.4 (yrs).”
May COVID-19 go in this way? No, hopefully. There may be a few more trials of
new vaccines and/or chemicals within this transient-abnormal period. The trials
could have no tangible effect by nature at best, but might cause a tangible 2nd
wave COVID-19 with the newer generation Virus
by chance at worst. No more trial should be. It’s the time when the Virus will have extremely defeated the modern medicine(s).
As there’s no more new generation Virus,
COVID-19 practically enters an abnormal period
of go-down mode. It’ll be around Jan. 2021. From this time point, 8 (months) later, around in Sept. 2021,
COVID-19 reenters the normal period of new dynamic equilibrium with the Virus. It’s an extreme end of COVID-19.
During the go-down period, have-done countries are temporally under the siege in be-doing countries. The former should
exercise a self-blockade until the extreme
end. To be frank, this is a method of, “Leave it up to
nature and que sera sera.” What
will be, will be. But it’s never worse than endless war on the Virus with doomed pharmaceuticals. Choose
the lesser of 2 evils from ‘do nothing
good’ & ‘do something wrong.’
The strategic countermeasure, lockdown, is often doomed to failure due
to objections from various industrial complexes. This strategy should be
executed only by a strong leadership with a support from the people who hold a
successful experience of this kind in history. The USA has a kind of lockdown
in its history, i.e., Prohibition (1920 1933) against alcoholic drinks that’s
said to be a magnificent experiment rare in history. It ended up miserably in
repeal under the challenges of alcohol makers (gangs) and the pressure of Great
Depression (1929~1939). Really in the world, there’s no country besides
China who has history of successful experience of full-scale strict lockdowns.
In other words, only China has relief players in a bullpen to replace impotent
starting players. Everybody must learn a crucial lesson from China’s performance
in dealing with COVID-19.
To be frank, he is passive to the
implementation of lockdown, as it retards economy, but insignificantly confines
COVID-19. Further, it breeds gangs, traffickers and corruptors. He’d say
herewith only “Never use chemicals,
especially splay disinfectants in a locked-down area.” If it’d be done, it
could make the area be full of the Virus.
ANALYSES OF COVID-19
General
This SECT. commences with the Sub-sect. ‘Causation Analysis of COVID-19’.
It’s followed by 2 Sub-sects., viz. ‘Relation
between COVID-19 & Wars’ and
‘Analogy between COVID-19 & Wars.’ For the former, this study refers
to 6 wars, namely the Chinese
Civil War (1927 1949), Korean War (1950 1953), Sino-Soviet border conflict (1969), Vietnam War (1955 1975), Soviet Russia–Afghan War (1979 1989),
and Afghanistan War (2001
2020). For the latter, this paper picks up the 2 wars of Afghanistan
war (2001 2020) and Yemen War (2015 present).
COVID-19 and wars stand on the 3 common bases,
viz. (i)
COVID-19 itself is a war-like event, (ii) the Virus itself is eligible for a bio-weaponry material, and (iii)
no country can endure the protracted burden of COVID-19 and/or warfare.
UN’s COVID-19 ceasefire suggestions for all the
ongoing wars, ditto for particular wars in Yemen & Libya, Saudi Arabia’s
unilateral Yemen War ceasefire proposal to cope with COVID-19, USA’s claim on
COVID-19 compensation for China, and China’s preparation for war against it etc,
all reflect the close relationship between COVID-19 & wars. The analogy
between COVID-19 and the two selected wars is a categorical expression of the
relationship.
In this context, to study COVID-19 by analogy
to the wars is useful for both KOVID-19 and the warfare studies.
Causation Analysis of COVID-19
As learnt earlier, the Virus’s last intermediate host is a bat as lab tested. Where? When?
How? The 1st patient appeared in a food market in Wuhan city in Dec.
2919. The wide repertory of Chinese food materials is nothing new. It entered a
human body through a mouth.
When did the Virus first enter a bat body? Where? How? There’s been no answer
yet. They’re the themes of due-diligent studies. However, he’d like herein to
exhibit some proposals by mobilizing his inspiration. That is; (i)
the emergence of the Virus is the result of natural bio–lifecycle disruption, (ii)
the disruption is not global but local, maybe, Wuhan-Hubei regional, (iii)
the disruption is somehow related to chemicals, e.g., excessive use of
agrochemicals in nearby farms.
Once the Virus entered
a human body, pandemic went ahead with human-to-human transmission. The time
when the COVID-19 entered each country or zone is different, and its aspect is
also quantitatively different. But all the aspects show no qualitative
difference each other. Why so they do? It’s because the basic stance to counter
COVID-19 in developed & rapidly developing countries are the same, ‘handle the matter as programmed,’ and
the programs are qualitatively the same, and the matter was beyond the programs.
It’s no wonder that all the measures applied to the matter in these countries
failed in a 1-pattern aspect. It was waxed by one of the common characters of
the program-governed regimes, i.e., “to
repeat the same mistake again and again until stalemating all the means.”
As explained earlier, indiscriminate disinfectant sprays had
played the greatest role in the rapid outbreak, not only by strengthening the Virus but also by killing its natural
predator. He herewith elaborates it as follows:
First, “How could COVID-19 cases
increased so rapidly?” Human-to-human transmission only can’t convince of
it. The Virus mass-production must
have been.
The Virus is an aerobe. When it meets a
disinfectant splay, it enters a wait-&-endure formation. It’ll be washed
away into a roadside ditch by either rainfalls or artificial water flows. Urban
roadside ditches are normally covered by concrete-slabs to increase the
effective width of the road. Hence, it’s a closed culvert of partially aerobic
and mostly anaerobic where the Virus’
natural predator (anaerobe) lives. The Virus
comes in the ditch being accompanied with disinfectant which kills the Virus’ natural predator, resulting in the
Virus’ safety travel to its final
destination ‘an aeration tank at a sewage
treatment plant.’ Given
oxygen foods there, the Virus in a
phage phase multiples as other aerobes of active-sledge origin do. Thus, the mass
production of the Virus has been
done.
cf. Photo 1~3 and explanations by
respective origins.
Photo 1 volunteer sprays
disinfectant Photo 3 disinfectant
spray on road
Photo 2 disinfectant spray on mask (origin: cf. 1~3 below)
1: Elana Dilozier,”‘The Coronavirus Pandemic Could Be the Key to Peace in Yemen.” https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/04/09
A Yemeni volunteer sprays disinfectant on the hands of kids in one
of impoverished neighborhoods in Sana'a, on March 30, amid concerns of a corona
virus outbreak. MOHAMMED HUWAIS/AFP VIA GETTY
IMAGES
3: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/03/does-disinfecting-surfaces-really-prevent-spread-coronavirus
Second: “How could COVID-19 expand so quickly to
thousands of kilometers distant zone of so wide?” It can’t be properly explained by
human-to-human transmission only. Mass-transportation must have been. He shall answer
this question.
The players of the quick-mass-transportation
are: (i)
Extra tropical hurricanes along European & American coasts of the Atlantic
Ocean, and (ii) Typhoons of the S-Pacific Ocean, land S-China / travel via
trans-mainland-China course to Far-E Siberia. cf. [10]. As elaborated in it, the extra-tropical hurricanes and typhoons
of different courses & seasons from the past ones are caused by nuclear
power plants’ warm-water emission.
The extra tropical hurricane occurs not in a
tropical but in a temperate zone, and not in summer - autumn but in winter -
spring. It's born at the S-W end of a warm front formed off the Iberian
Peninsula, and moves along the warm front to N-E direction via a subarctic up
to a cold zone. In between Dec. 2019 and Mar. 2020, a few hurricanes had
mass-transported the Virus from S-W
Europe to N & N-E Europe.
On the W-side of the Atlantic Ocean, the matter
is similar to the W-side of the Pacific Ocean, reflecting the similar nuke
power development. cf. next paragraph.
The Virus
delivery by typhoon is seen in China. The COVID-19 development in Jilin province,
E-N-China is the case. Jilin province’s area is 190000 (km2). The distance between Wuhan and Jilin city is 2178
(km). The Virus’ quick-mass-expansion from Wuhan to Jilin is possible only by
the transportation power of ‘trans-mainland-China-course
typhoons’.
In the E-side of the Pacific Ocean, the matter
is similar but to a lesser extent.
The effect of extra tropical cyclones on the
spread of COVID-19 in N-hemisphere is proven by the fact that COVID-19 spreads
far less & slower in S-hemisphere than in N-hemisphere, and there’s no
eligible cause to explain the phenomenon besides ‘the lesser active-sludge-aeration sewage treatment and no extra tropical
cyclone’ in S-hemisphere.
Relation between COVID-19 and Wars
Immortal Effects of
Maoism
As Mao Zedong wasn’t blessed with good
successors, the death of this revolutionary of genius forced the Maoism effects
to be at a standstill for a half century in the world history. COVID-19 has
triggered a resurgence of Maoism. As explained earlier, there’re many assignments
of the wrong persons in the wrong places. COVID-19 is a war-like event to which
technocrats who’ve been possessed by computer-program governed system do not
fit, much less to the war itself.
The easiest way of modernization and industrial
development is to duplicate models in developed countries. However, even with
utmost efforts, duplication can never exceed the original. Unless there’d be
some new idea beyond the original, a duplicator is always a 2nd
runner. A new idea doesn’t come from the computer program-guided system. cf. [14]. Reflecting this rule, Chinese
modernization technocrats used to feel inferiority complex to originality
bearers, the USA in particular. He thinks their behavior to the USA is often
biased toward defeatism-oriented appeasement.
Then, here’s an antithesis that says, “There’re many made-in-China products of new
ideas. This fact contradicts the above theory.” Well, it seems to be so.
However, it doesn’t necessary mean that the ideas come from big modern
enterprises of well-connected to and financed by national budgetary systems. Generally,
new ideas come from small and medium enterprises of
being usually financially hungry. They
may promote their projects of new ideas with the sections under Maoists’
jurisdictions. It results in some budgetary allowances to the sections
concerned and political funds from small & medium size enterprises to the
Maoist factions. Referring to recent domestic-international features, he’s sure
“Maoism is now rapidly rolling back in
China.”
En passant, currently leading weapons, namely drone,
missile
and nuke
are all not American but German origin. German’s creativeness was cultivated
during an extremely financially hungry era after WWI. Ideas stated above came
from this creativeness. What the well-fed USA has done is only the soft- & hard-ware-wise
sophistications on the originals.
Contrarily to the modernization technocrats,
Maoists have self-confidence to the modern-weapon-armored developed countries.
It’d been cultivated through the Korean War and the Sino-Soviet Russia conflict
which they fought evenly and finished in draws.
The former war was against the USA who was
supported militarily by Great Britain, Canada, France, Belgium, the
Netherlands, Colombia, Ethiopia, South Africa, New Zealand, Turkey, Greece,
Thailand, Philippines & Luxembourg, and assisted medically by Norway,
Sweden, Denmark, India & Italy. The latter was against Soviet Russia who
was supported by its satellite republics. The battles of the Korean War had
been stalemated at front lines with hand-to-hand close-quarters combats, People's
Volunteer Army (PVA)’s tactic, in which the USA coalition forces were
forced to have engaged. Then Premier of Soviet Union, Joseph Stalin thought
first that weaponry poor China would be defeated even if helped, and refrained
from having been involved. However, having realized China’s formidable power,
Soviet Russia later started having offered limited airpower participation to
protect PVA’s logistic routs. The commander, General Douglas MacArthur proposed
to use nuke bombs as the last resort to solve the stalemate. Then USA President
Harry S. Truman rejected the proposal, fired the general from the post and
terminated the war in 3-yrs.
In
the case of Sino-Soviet Russia conflict, it’s much shorter lived, as Soviet
Russia had already learnt lessons from the Korean War, by having observed it
throughout its period.
Remember
the 2 wars’ above explained processes, and readers will better understand the
analogy to COVID-19 to be elaborated in the next Sub-sect.
Readers
know? The hand-to-hand combat isn’t a favorable subject of a modernized regular
army, particularly of developed countries. Hence, these countries used to
employ mercenaries from undeveloped countries (Sudan, Chad, Niger, Uganda etc)
or even from terrorist groups (Al Qaeda, ISIS etc). They’re evidently seen in
all the ongoing wars in the world, e.g., W-Africa (Mali), E-Africa (Somalia),
N-Africa (Libya), Middle E (Yemen), S-America (Venezuela) etc. Or some
countries (Iran, Iraq, Lebanon etc) build up an independent force that can carry
out close-quarters combats, besides regular forces.
Readers
see? Big figures participated in the 2 wars
on China, viz. USA, Soviet Russia, UK, India, France, Italy, and Turkey are
high ranked in COVID-19 worst hit countries list. He sees a close relationship
between COVID-19 and the 2 wars. So do you?
General Effects of Mao’s Strategies and Tactics
It’s seen in the following 2 wars:
(1) Vietnam War (1955 1975)
After France’s defeat
in 1954, Vietnam was divided into 2 countries of Emperor Bao Dai ruled
so-called S-Vietnam and President Ho Chi Minh led N-Vietnam. Vietnam War
started with Mao’s ‘people’s war’ pattern by National
Liberation Front (NLF) in S-Vietnam against the Bao Dai regime that was
supported by the USA. Ho Chi Minh first thought “The resistance won’t last long, facing USA’s by-far-superior weaponry,
and even if helped, it’s unwinnable,” and really refrained from having been
involved in the war. But having realized NLF’s formidable fighting power;
N-Vietnam changed its mind and started participating into the war. The war
ended when the S-Vietnam capital Saigon fell. During the war, N-Vietnam
rejected Mao’s strategies & tactics, and preferred weaponry from Soviet
Russia. He doesn’t think N-Vietnam’s weaponry defeated the USA. He’s sure the
USA was defeated by NIF’s protracted war of attrition. But the victory was
hijacked by N-Vietnam.
(2) Soviet Russia–Afghan War (1979 1989)
The war was fought between groups known collectively as the mujahedeen, or representatively the Taliban (the biggest group) &
smaller Maoist groups on the defense-side
and Soviet Russia supported by its satellite republics and pro-Soviet Russia
Afghanistan government on the offense-side. The defense-side had supports from the USA, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, the UK and China, The ideology of the defense-side was group-by-group
different. But their strategy and tactics were common, i.e., protracted war of
attrition by ‘siege the city in rural
areas’ and ‘close-quarters combat.’
The USA supplied surface-to-air stinger missiles worked well, but didn’t play a
decisive role as a war terminator. An ultimate factor that brought about a
defense-side victory and the sequent destruction of Soviet Union was the
protracted war of attrition.
Pay attention to the fact that the method of
strict siege capital city Kabul in rural areas executed during the war was,
after 12 (yrs) later, used again in
the next Afghanistan War and is still working after the peace deal (2020) with
the US, and practically functioning as an anti COVID-19 lockdowns now.
Analogy between COVID-19 and Wars
General
There’s a common factor that makes COVID-19 and
the 2 Wars be analogous. It’s an adaptability
of organisms. The adaptability exists commonly in all the species of all
organisms. However, its aspect is species-by-species different. That is; in the
species of homo sapience, a physical adaptation occurs in a geological time range
of millions of years, but it mentally adapts itself to the given conditions
within a time range of seconds. On
the other hand, in the species of microbe, it physically adapts itself to an
environmental change within a time range of
days, but has no mental adaptability. Following these rules, COVID-19 and
wars proceed with many points of analogy. Focusing on the ‘adaptability’, 2 wars are studied by analogy to COVID-19.
Afghanistan War (2001 2020)
This war was fought between the USA &
USA-installed aboriginal government on one side and US pulled-down domestic
Taliban government on the other side. The former was supported by 46 countries
including NATO members. On the other side, unlike at the time of Soviet
Russia-Afghanistan War, no country supported the Taliban. Most of countries in
the world thought, “The sole super power
will win the war within a few weeks.” And 46 of them participated in the
war, having jumped on a bandwagon of lucrative development projects in the
resource rich Afghanistan under the changed regime. Soviet Russia had been
already a lame duck. One more communist big power, China, had been under a
modernization technocrats’ regime, and had already abandoned revolutionary
resistance abroad. Due to the sudden downfall of communism as a leading
revolutionary ideology, there was concurrently & temporarily no ideology to
lead revolutionary movements in the world. History can’t run without it. What
filled this vacuum was Islamism. Its 1st successful work-done was
the 1979 Islamic revolution in Iran. Would the Afghanistan War result in Taliban’s victory; it’d be the 2nd
work-done.
Taliban’s basic war strategy and tactics throughout the war
had been ‘siege the cities in rural areas’
and ‘close-quarters combats with weapons
of new idea.’ From among the new-idea weapons, the big 3 are Improvised
Explosive Devices (IED), a variety of mobile suicide bomb and light-&-heavy
guns in sequent martyr storming. These strategy and tactics brought about a
protracted war of attrition. No country could endure
such pain. How long can a country endure it? It’s
country-by-country different. The USA endured it for 18.4 (yrs). The Taliban will endure it until the USA withdraws its forces
from Afghanistan. In this regard, there’re 2 questions: (i) Why the super power
supported by 46 countries can’t win the war on a poor country of no external
support? And (ii) why did the USA give up the war of life-&-money attrition
first, despite bigger population than Afghanistan and the biggest economy in the
world? Let’s learn.
As
for (i), a strategy of killing civilians
by discriminate rather than indiscriminate bombings on a pretext of reducing
resultant casualties by shortening a war period has been a usual strategy during
& after WWII. The biggest example is Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuke bombings.
This strategy works on an enemy country led by country’s elite. After WWII,
almost all the countries in the world pertain to this category. These counties have
never challenged the USA. All the protracted wars that the USA has been
fighting after WWII are not elete’s but people’s war. Though some of these wars
are led by terrorists, people regard the terrorists as the lesser of two evils,
as they have already learnt miserable lives under occupier’s indirect control
through a corrupt elite regime. This
is why the USA couldn’t & can’t win the wars after WWII. Generally, if a
method can’t solve a problem more than 1 (yr),
the method per se is wrong. Stop the war. What will be, will be. Any result isn’t
worse than an endless war of attrition.
As for (ii), an effort to win people’s war by sophisticating weapons
will be doomed to failure in the case where the counterpart has adaptability to
it. If it’s the case, you need a new idea. A last resort on the same thought as
it is now do nothing better. For the sake of better understanding, he shall
show a typical example.
During the war, the USA once tried to grade-up
armored vehicles in order to counter IED. USA modified the floor boards of
armored vehicles by making them be downward vertex triangular shape so that the
explosive power flows away to both sides with less impact. Together with other
measures, it was said that the vehicle was 2-times stronger than it’d been
before the modification. After lab- and field-tests, vehicles were in practical
services. It took hundreds of millions of $s and a 3-yr-long time. The Taliban compromised it by using 2 times quantity
of explosives and using more road-side IEDs than under-road ones. The Taliban
achieved the solutions with a marginal cost and time. The repetition of the
same competition is lucrative for weapon makers, but it’s an endless agony for
tax-payers.
The Taliban started using drone-IEDs and
surface-to-air missiles at the relatively late stage of the war. They worked
effectively. However, the cause that had forced the war to end isn’t the drones
& missiles, but the 18.4-yr-long
protracted war of attrition.
Yemen War (2015~present)
The war started with the invasion of Arab
coalition led by Saudi Arabia, supported in operation by Egypt, Morocco,
Jordan, Sudan, the UAE, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, and Academi (war contractor).
Djibouti, Eritrea, and Somalia made their airspace, territorial waters, and
military bases available to the coalition.
The USA, Canada, China, UK, France, Germany and other EU member countries
helped them hard- / software-wise. The supports were given having had a
request from a client, an internationally recognized government (fugitive
government). Against the invasion, Yemen’s resistance group Ansar Allah
movement and its allies' government (Sana’a government) began counter attacks. Sana’a
government was supported by members of a resistance axis group, Lebanon, Syria
and Palestine (Sana’a government Yemen itself is also one of the group
members). Iran is the greatest supporter. However, because of tight blockage,
their supports may have not been so much hardware-wise but mainly
software-wise.
Reflecting the difference from Afghanistan War
in the boundary conditions, the strategies and tactics employed by the invaders
and defenders in this war are different from the ones adopted in Afghanistan War.
For instance, the populated cities in Yemen are mostly in the plateaus
surrounded by mountainous areas which are under Sana’a government control.
Hence, Saudi-coalition conducted the strategy of ‘naval-land-aerial blockade.’ It’s also easier for the coalition to
air-strike civilians & civilian infrastructure.
The defenders have adapted themselves to invaders’
attacks even with modern weapons symmetrically to some extent by mobilizing
domestic resources with new ideas. Being helped software-wise, the defenders
have developed weapons of their original. From among them, the one that has
played a role of game changer is a ground-creeping drone. Up to the date,
drones had been being used exclusively for strategic purposes, e.g., spotting, reconnaissance,
assassinations, attacking economic targets etc. Hence, drones’ development had
focused on how long & how high its reach, altitude & velocity can go.
Correspondingly, the development to counter the attack had been in the same
manner as the attack. That is, the system has been too naïve or practically
rather defenseless to the ultra low-&-slaw drone attacks. Against this
backdrop, the defenders used the drones for both strategic and tactical
purposes. Saudi Aramco Refinery attacks (Sep. 14 2018) and border region Najran battle, capturing thousands of Saudi troops (25 Sep. 2019) are the real
executions of them. The idea of ground-creeping drone is a
typical kind of idea coming from a hungry condition. Yemen, not Iran, is in
that condition. That is, the drones aren’t Iran’s but Yemen’s original. Iran
may be one of the countries who are astonished
by the drones of new idea.
En passant, among countries concerned, there’re
3 categories of responses to the drone of new idea, viz. (i) paying no attention
(Russia), (ii) trying to establish a counter weapon (the USA &
Israel), and (iii) adopting the same drone (Turkey). The results of (i)
& (iii) are explicitly shown in Libya struggle of Tripoli as an
obvious defeat of Libya National Army (LNA) supported by Russian and Israeli
anti-drone missiles and a game-changing victory of Government of National Accord
(GNA)’s Syrian mercenaries supported by Turkish drones.
Sana’a government says there’ll be more mew
weapons. It’s not a bluff but a real prediction. The drones together with these
weapons will balance air strikes in the Yemen War. And, regardless of like or
not, the war continues protracted war of greter attrition. Nobody likes it.
There’s no solution other than finding a way to coexist peacefully with Sana’a
government. This way is generally applicable to all the protracted wars. Otherwise,
“The only victor of all US wars
across the world has been the US military-industrial complex, which growth and
expansion depends on a continuation of global conflicts which
create a stable demand to manufacture more weapons.” [14]
Analogy to COVID-19
Keep in mind the above statements on the 2 wars,
read sentences below. Readers will be able to realize the analogy between the
wars and COVID-19.
(1) To recover the balance of natural bio-lifecycle disrupted by
an environmental change due to an unknown cause, e.g., aggressive use of chemicals
in near-by farms.
(2)
Having been exposed
to the environmental change, the novel Virus
appeared with its natural predator, after having adapted itself to chemicals in
general. All then-applicable medicines & disinfectants incorporated in
computer programs of a modern medical-sanitation system had lost the validity. Note:
This is the work of God. Nobody can stop
it.
(3) As the characters of the Virus
hadn’t yet been known when it appeared in China, it’s pardonable for medical
teams in charge to have dealt with COVID-19 abided by the inapplicable programs
with invalid chemicals & disinfectants. Its 2 biggest negative consequences
were (i)
strengthened the Virus all-round from
adsorption, penetration, and replication to
release, and (ii) killed the Virus’
natural predator.
(4) It resulted in uncontrollable outbreak of COVID-19. The point
in issue is “modern medicine’s repetition of the wrong practices again &
again until it bankrupted per se.”
(5) This abnormal period was interrupted in China when the
starting players of modern medicine technocrats who has no idea to confine
COVID-19 were replaced by relief players who know a lockdown strategy with the
experience of ‘siege the city in rural
areas’ and have alternative tactics of traditional Chinese medicine &
medicines, ‘herbs’. Under the new
team, China has been already in a state of countering the reentry of the Virus from abroad.
(6) In other countries, there’s no such ‘historically bred culture’, hence, no relief players equivalent to the
one in China. Hence, the abnormal period lasts until modern medicine(s) stop
the bankrupt practices. It’s the time when the current transient abnormal
period starts for a new dynamic equilibrium, i.e., a normal period in which
human being will coexist with the Virus
and its natural predator.
(7) If the war against COVID-19 would continue until genuine vaccine could be set up as the WHO conceives, it’s tantamount to
seek the blue bard, Maeterlinck (1862
1949). It ends up merely in, “The only
victor of all wars on COVID-19 in the world has been the pharmaceutical-industrial
complex, whose growth and expansion has benefits from a continuation of
global diseases which create a stable demand to manufacture more pharmaceuticals.”
PREPARATION FOR FUTURE SIMILAR VIRUS
General
Whenever a novel microbe emerges, it’s always accompanied
with its natural predator in balance. Therefore, unless the natural predator is
mistakenly neutralized, the production of natural predator is unnecessary. He
hopes the same mistake won’t be repeated again.
However,
there’s a case of sudden emergence of a novel pathogen without a natural predator.
A bio-weapon attack is the case. The microbe to be used in the bio-weapon is to
be such that of the Virus of high
adaptability to existing pharmaceuticals and disinfectants. To counter the pathogen
with vaccine doesn’t make sense.
To
prepare for all possibilities, the basic method to produce a natural predator
of any identified microbe is explained in this SECT. The explanations are from a septic tank and an aeration container
of Length*Depth*Width=2*0.5*1 (m) and
Diameter*Height =0.3*0.8 (m)
respectively, which are installed in his Restaurant Lab for the purposes of
food disposal studies. cf. [19] & [25]. In virus related practices, of
course, some modifications & revisions will be needed.
How to recruit Natural Predator Candidate
The process to recruit natural predator candidate is as follows. cf. Illus. 2.
Illus. 2 How to recruit Natural Predator Candidate
(1)
Have a food-waste treatment septic tank that
follows your command.
(2)
Have pieces of synthetic sponge; Place them in a septic
tank.
Note: They’re for microbes’ habitat. Natural
sponge is eaten by some microbes. It’s
confirmed there’s no microbe that eat any synthetic plastics.
(3)
Begin routine
operations. Microbes start multiplying. The operation is to last at least for 1
(month).
(4)
Stop the operation
for more than 1 (month) to make
microbes be hungry.
(5)
Pull out all pieces
of sponge, and pack them in plastic bags. Seal the bags completely.
(6)
Leave the bags for
more than 1 (month) in a room to make
the microbes be fully hungry.
Note 1: The performance of the natural predator
production so much depends on the degree
of hungry of microbes. The hungrier the microbes are, the better the natural
predator production performance is.
Note 2: In the operation, any dishwasher detergent may be
used. It’s been confirmed that dishwasher detergents sold in markets do not
retard the activity of anaerobes in a septic tank. So will it be in the case of
natural predator. Pure surfactant detergent is preferable.
The 1st
half of natural-predator-production has been over.
How to breed Candidate Natural Predator
The activities of the breeding process are as follows. cf. Illus. 3.
Illus. 3 How to breed candidate Natural Predator
(1)
Open the bags, and
pour pathogen gel (already otherwise provided) into each bag. All microbes
including the candidate natural predators are hungry. But the fed one is the
natural predator of the pathogen only.
(2)
Seal the bags again
and store them for more than 1 (month).
In the bags, the multiplied microbe is the natural predator of the pathogen
only.
(3)
Open the bags, take
out the sponges and squeeze them to extract the microbe sol. The sol is a
mixture of various kinds of microbes. Among them, by-far the greatest quantity
group is of the natural predator.
(4)
Separate the natural
predator by means of centrifuge.
Dishwasher and pathogen Killer devices
On the dishwasher of air-foam & vapor-foam types, 2 papers have been
presented. cf. [19] & [25]. There’s no essential difference
between them theoretically and practically. A difference is only functional.
The latter kills the Virus by boiling
water and the former wash it away by normal water. The Virus elimination power of the latter is much greater than of the
former. This paper shows the latter where a steam cooker is used. cf. Photo.
(a) Steam
cooker (b) Ready to operate (c) Foam in full (d) Rinsing
Photo
4 Vapor
foam dishwasher
The device consists of 3 parts, viz. a gas stove, a water-boiler
pan and a steam chamber. See Photo
(a). A table napkin of about 2*2 (ft)
is also needed as an accessory.
The
process of works is: 1st,
pour water in the water boiler pan up to 2-cm
high, add detergent as specified and stir it to whip air foam at 3-cm depth. 2nd: put the pan & the chamber on the gas
stove and put dish in the chamber. See Photo
(b). 3rd, switch on
gas stove, when it starts boiling, cover the chamber with the napkin. Adjust gas
switch so as to avoid boil over and keep foam’s height adequate. 4th, 5 (min) after boiling started, switch off,
remove the cover napkin and rinse the dish at the spot with normal water.
Note 1: The napkin prevents foam
boiling over. However, its main function is to let foam leave its absorbed
substance there.
Note 2: Vapor foam is much more vulnerable than air foam against
cooler & drier external air. To keep vapor foam more stable, have the top
surface of rising vapor foam covered with air foam of a few-cm deep. To whip
air foam in the pan at the 1st stage of the work is for this
purpose. During the work, the air bubble reinforced. He realized it by a soap-bubble-making toy.
Note 3: Rinse is done at the spot. It’s to supply water and
recycle remnant detergent on washed dish.
The
inscribed steam cooker can be used as a pathogen killer for heat-durable small
tools and clothes contaminated by the pathogen. In this case, water needs no
detergent.
CONCRUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATI/ONS
This paper summarizes its conclusions as
follows:
(1) The Virus is of novel
characters which hadn’t yet been incorporated into the programs of modern
medicine at the time when COVID-19 commenced.
(2)
From among the novel
characters, the one that played a decisive role is the virus’ adaptability to
chemicals.
(3) The adaptation of an organism is the driving power of evolution.
The evolution is the work of God. Hence, besides killing the organism there’s
no way to stop it. It's impossible to kill such an organism in a human body
without harming the human itself. In this context, there’s no vaccine to
neutralize the Virus. Any fort to
have it is in vain.
(4) As the modern medical system didn’t know the Virus’ unprecedented characters, it’s
pardonable for it to have started with inapplicable medicines which didn’t kill
but strengthened the Virus, resulting
in an unprecedented pandemic. The matter is “despite obvious failure, the system repeated the same mistake until its
bankruptcy.”
(5) In the N-hemisphere, the Virus
was mass-produced
by aeration at sewage treatment plants and mass-transported by extra-tropical cyclones,
each of which is lesser & nil respectively in the S-hemisphere.
(6) COVID-19 is waning status now, thanks for practically ‘give up’ situation in almost all
countries. If there’d be no-more trial of pharmaceuticals, and also no more
implementation of lockdown, COVID-19 would end within 8 (months) from now.
(7) A sole solution to the same events as COVID-19 in a future is
to coexist with the virus and its natural predator in a new bio-cycle. Concrete
measures to realize it are: (i) to have an effective system to
identify pathogen in a national level, (ii) to build up a septic-tank network to breed natural
predator of the specified pathogen in a regional level, (iii) to familiarize
dishwasher and other pathogen-killing devices with people at a live level.
(8) COVID-19 is a warlike event per se. the Virus itself is qualified to be a bio-weapon material. Besides
these direct relations, COVID-19 has indirect relations to wars. No wonder,
specific wars are analogous to COVID-19. Afghanistan war (2001 2020) &
Yemen War (2915 present) pertain to this category. Hence, to study KOVID-19 by
analogy to the wars is useful to know the nature of both.
(9) In the 2 wars, invaders are both well-fed countries and
defenders are both hungry countries. The latter adapted themselves to the
former’s superior weaponry with their domestically-produced original weaponry
with their wisdom. At this time point, the people of defending country entered
a mental evolution era. The evolution is the work of God. The wars entered an
endless protracted people’s war of attrition. The money in coffers is finite
but the wisdom of human is infinitive. Why the well-fed people don’t use wisdom
as well? Answer is: because the wisdom doesn’t come from the well-feds. Who is
a winner in an infinitively long war? Answer is the war industry.
This paper’s
recommendations are as follows:
(10) As far as COVID-19
or the like concerned, all the pharmaceuticals (chemicals & vaccines) and
disinfectants shall not be used. The lockdowns are questionable unless executed
strictly.
(11) To build natural predator production facilities is
recommended to prepare for possible COVIC-19 type quick pandemic either by
mistake or bio-weaponry warfare in a future. The vaccine to counter either case
doesn’t make sense.
(12) He recommends researchers to be engaged more in
analogical studies that generally lack in researchers who are currently bogged
around computers. The analogy between COVID-19 and Wars reveals a fact “any weapon or any pharmaceuticals of
sophistication can’t overpower adaptability of any organism.” In isolated
studies on these 2 themes, researchers won’t be able to find the truth.
EPILOGUE
Any study
starts with a theme. Next is to find premises from which a hypothesis comes
inductively. This step is indispensable if the theme is of scientific
complexity. The hypothesis is to be deductively proven to be a theory.
He has set up a hypothesis based on applicable
premises. Of course there may be a researcher who is able to approach more
premises. Based on them, if the researcher would derive a different hypothesis of
his own, it’s wonderful per se. He shall learn it.
REFERENCES
[01] Sohei Matsuno, Zul Hendri, ‘A STUDY ON THE CAUSE OF KUKAR BRIDGE
COLLAPSE,’ www.iba.ac.id, Jan. 6, 2012
[02] Sohei
Matsuno, Zul Hendri, ‘’A STUDY ON THE
CAUSE OF KUKAR BRIDGE
COLLAPSE (sequel),’ www.iba.ac.id/
[03] Sohei Matsuno, ‘UIBA'S AND HAPPY PONTIST'S KUKAR BRIDGE COLLAPSE THEORY,’
www.iba.ac.iddocuments/83
[04] Sohei Matsuno, ‘2011 JAPAN QUAKE OVERPOWERS PLATE TECTONICS’, repo.ia.ac.id/index
[05] Sohei Matsuno, ‘SUMATRA-JAVA LINKAGE PROJECT OF FEASIBILITY’,
www.akademika.iba.ac.id,
Aug. 1 2012
[06] Sohei
Matsuno, ‘CAUSE & PREVENTION OF COASTAL FLOOFING, JAKAETA FLOODING AS A CASE,’ www.iba.ac.id/
[07] Sohei Matsuno, ‘JAKARTA
FLOOD PREVENTION PROJECT WITH A TRUE CAUSE,’ www.iba.ac.id/ 8 Mar 2013
[08] Sohei
Matsuno, ‘JAKARTA FLOOD
PREVENTION WITH A TRUE CAUSE (sequel),’ www.lba.ac.id/, 30 Apr.2013
[09] Sohei Matsuno, ‘JAKARTA-FLOOD PREVENTION BY
TRAINING DIKE vs. GIANT SEA WALL,’ www.iba.ac.id/,
[10] Sohei Matsuno, ‘SEA LEVEL RISE AND COASTAL FLOODING
(JAKARTA),
[11] Sohei Matsuno et al, ‘A CAUSAL STUDY ON THE AIRASIA AIRBUS CRASH
EVENT,’ www.iba.ac.id/ 2015
[12] Sohei Matsuno, Asmadi,
‘A STUDY ON LUFTHANSA GERMANWINGS AIRBUS CRASH EVENT,’ www.iba.ac.id/documents/, 2015
[13] S. Matsuno, ‘STUDY ON LUFTHANSA GERMANWINGS AIRBUS
CRASH,’
www.iba.ac.id/
[14] Dr. Sohei Matsuno,
MS. Pujiono, ‘LEARN BEA'S PRELIMINARY REPORT ON LUFTHANSA CRASH,’ www.iba.ac.id/documents/
[15] Sohei Matsuno, ‘STUDY
ON RUSSIAN METROJET AIRBUS CRASH,’
soheimatsuno.blogspot.com/, Jan
8, 2016
[16] Sohei Matsuno, ‘REVIEW OF AIRBUS CRASH & BUDGET
SYSTEM -- given new data by Daallo event & AirAsia –‘soheimatsuno.blogspot.com/, May 30 2016
[17] Sohei Matsuno, ‘STUDY ON EGYPTAIR AIRBUS
CRASH,’
[18] Sohei
Matsuno, Kimora
Matsuno, ‘LEARN AIRBUS CRASH FROM METROJET-/EGYPTAIR-EVENT,’ soheimatsuno.blogspot.com/, Nov 29, 2018
[19] Sohei Matsuno, Kimora Matsuno, ‘STUDY ON AIRBUS CRASH BY ANALOGY TO DISHWASHER SLUMP,’ soheimatsuno.blogspot.com/2018/06/html Jun 6, 2018
[20] ‘Transmission routes of 2019-nCoV and controls in dental practice’,
Peace
[25] Sohei Matsuno,
Kimora Matsuno, ‘LEARN KRAKATAU (2918) BY
ANALOGY TO KRAKATAU (1883)’ soheimatsuno.blogspot.com > 2010/06, Jun 3, 2019
No comments:
Post a Comment